This pro-austerity mythology [which animates orthodox economics and economic policy in the United States and elsewhere] aims to distract the public from asking why peacetime governments can’t simply print the money they need. Given the option of printing money instead of levying taxes, why do politicians only create new spending power for the purpose of waging war and destroying property, not to build or repair bridges, roads and other public infrastructure? Why should the government tax employees for future retirement payouts, but not Wall Street for similar user fees and financial insurance to build up a fund to pay for future bank over-lending crises? For that matter, why doesn’t the U.S. Government print the money to pay for Social Security and medical care, just as it created new debt for the $13 trillion post-2008 bank bailout?
The answer to these questions: Banks and other financial institutions want to keep as much of their income as they can. Transaction fees, regulations, oversight, taxes, etc. — these consume profits. America’s banks want to transfer these costs to others, namely, to those individuals who lack the political power to defend their standard of living. This cost transfer project amounts to a hidden and sometimes obvious tax the government levies on the 99%. When coupled to a system of risky and fraudulent financial transactions, elite looting and private debt creation, this cost transfer project amounts to little more than a predatory political economy.
The ridiculous fiscal cliff debate which now dominates America’s public life is but a crude expression of this predatory political economy.
- People Tell Me to Go Look at Bridgewater’s Highly Successful Ray Dalio on How He Looks at the Economy (delong.typepad.com)
- ‘Give criminal bankers’ money to homeless people’ (dearkitty1.wordpress.com)
- What happens to Americas global image if it defaults on the debt? (zynkinnews.com)
- Should Big Banks Be Broken Up? A Debate (transcript) (reform-wall-street.org)
- Monetary Malpractice: Moral Malady (safehaven.com)
- Japan (metafilter.com)
- Jim Willie: The Coming Isolation of the US Dollar (silverdoctors.com)
- Why Insane Deficits and Insane Money Printing Will Continue (economicpolicyjournal.com)
From a PCJF news release:
FBI documents just obtained by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) pursuant to the PCJF’s Freedom of Information Act demands reveal that from its inception, the FBI treated the Occupy movement as a potential criminal and terrorist threat even though the agency acknowledges in documents that organizers explicitly called for peaceful protest and did “not condone the use of violence” at occupy protests.
The PCJF has obtained heavily redacted documents showing that FBI offices and agents around the country were in high gear conducting surveillance against the movement even as early as August 2011, a month prior to the establishment of the OWS encampment in Zuccotti Park and other Occupy actions around the country.
In other words, according to Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, the Executive Director of the PCJF:
“These documents show that the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security are treating protests against the corporate and banking structure of America as potential criminal and terrorist activity. These documents also show these federal agencies functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of Wall Street and Corporate America.”
It is always good to have allies in high places….
Along with the thugs they authorize….
- FBI Documents Reveal Secret Nationwide Occupy Monitoring (phantomreport.com)
- FBI Investigated Occupy Movement as ‘Domestic Terrorists, Criminals’ (commondreams.org)
- Terrorists and criminals: Documents prove FBI monitored OWS (alethonews.wordpress.com)
- Terrorists and criminals: Documents prove FBI monitored OWS (rt.com)
- FBI Documents Reveal Secret Nationwide Occupy Monitoring (willyloman.wordpress.com)
- FBI Monitored Occupy Wall Street As Potential Terrorist, Criminal Threat (huffingtonpost.com)
- BREAKING: Glimpses of the COINTELPRO (insomniacs2.wordpress.com)
- Nationwide FBI [Redacted] monitoring file on #OWS describes OWS as a “criminal and terrorist threat” (12160.info)
The Occupy Movement has taken up the cause of providing disaster relief to the individuals and communities devastated by Hurricane Sandy. Individuals interested in helping or individuals seeking help can look for such at this site:
- Disaster Relief Supply Ready with Hurricane Sandy Supplies (prweb.com)
- Occupy and Sandy Storm Recovery Resources (otpglobal.wordpress.com)
- Occupy and Sandy Storm Recovery Resources (occupywallst.org)
- As Hurricane Sandy Strikes, Mitt Romney Wants to Drastically Cut Federal Disaster Relief (theageofblasphemy.wordpress.com)
- Hurricane Sandy Moves Occupy Wall Street from Protest to People-Powered Relief (techpresident.com)
- Hurrican Sandy Update – Disaster Relief & Hurricane Damage Check List by Foundation Armor (prweb.com)
Recently, political conformists in the United States celebrated the diminished presence of the Occupy Movement. To be sure, the lack of standing, active occupations — mostly due to the repression of such by America’s local militarized police forces — promoted a sense of relief among the conformists. The system worked! The Occupation failed; America remains intact; the natural aristocrats are still in charge. And their relief makes sense (to them) since the Occupy Movement was the first significant social challenge to America’s capitalist democracy and the austerity-minded political culture which emerged after the Recession of 2008. It is, after all, to this capitalist democracy that the conformists wish to conform. Failure, irrelevance ludicrousness of the Occupy Movement — these are the beliefs about the movement that pass muster among the corporate media.
Yet, we ought to ask, “Did the Occupy Movement fail?” The obvious answer: No! As Michael Niman points out:
The [corporate] media always held the Occupy movement to high standards, demanding nothing short of revolution, then calling the movement a failure when it failed to transform society in its first few months. But the pundits could only envision their own notion of revolution — replacing one set of leaders with another, all within the confines of our two-party system. Occupy, however, never aspired to being an electoral party or player, like the Tea Party, which, once organized, was co-opted by corporate interests in a matter of minutes. Occupy instead wanted to transform the debate — to shift the zeitgeist. To a punditocracy reduced to quantifying electoral battles as horse races, reporting on electoral tactics rather than substance, Occupy made no sense.
The Occupy Movement was and is a social movement, not an embryonic political party or new faction within the Democratic Party. Its goal: Radical change. Revolutions are instances of radical change. They are also improbable events just as radical change is improbable. It is because such change is improbable that demanding it from the Occupy Movement is tantamount to creating a pretext for judging the Movement a failure. Yet popular dissatisfaction remains intact, has real world motives and therefore must be considered a politically relevant variable in any analysis of America’s capitalist democracy that wants to be both sober and supported by evidence. The expression of this popular dissatisfaction only awaits an occasion which calls its name.
- Adbusters call for horizontal Revolution (thefreeonline.wordpress.com)
- Occupy: Politics as Division (kasamaproject.org)
- Social Movements and the Future of Occupy (stefanbc.wordpress.com)
- Was Occupy Wall Street a PR Failure? (mediabistro.com)
- What Does Occupy Represent and to Whom? (kasamaproject.org)
- Is Occupy One? (politicsoutdoors.com)
- Occupy’s protest is not over. It has barely begun | Frances Fox Piven (guardian.co.uk)
- Occupy Wall Street: a Frenzy That Fizzled (dealbook.nytimes.com)
Charles M. Young made me laugh with this celebration of OWS’ first birthday:
Is there anything less threatening than a morbidly obese cop on motor scooter?
Okay, 25 morbidly obese cops on motor scooters — that’s even more unthreatening. When I’m out in the streets chanting, “Show me what a police state looks like! THIS is what a police state looks like!” I think I have a right to be oppressed by proper storm troopers who have spent enough time at the gym to bristle instead of sag. They don’t have to be television actors or anything, but as a taxpayer, am I getting my money’s worth when I’m being beaten and arrested by a parade of fried dumplings?
I’m going to be fair here and admit that I did see a morbidly obese cop on a motor scooter run over somebody’s foot last fall. That was moderately threatening until the ambulance arrived.
Note to Mayor Bloomberg: Is this why you banned the 32 oz. Big Gulps? All the guards at your cement bunker on East 79th Street were getting diabetes?
Note to Commissioner Kelly: Make your cops get off the motor scooters and chase those anarchists on foot. It’s good exercise. You might lose some anarchists, but think how much less embarrassing it will be to display fewer bulges in blue uniforms the next time Obama ties up midtown for a fundraiser.
At least 60% of the NYPD looks like the governor of New Jersey. Where is your pride?
It must be uncomfortable to have a hundred pounds of potbelly squeezing like toothpaste out the edges of those bullet-proof vests. They aren’t fooling anyone, using those vests like girdles.
It’s probably even more uncomfortable to work for a mayor who is cutting your pension while claiming you as a soldier in his “personal army.” That would be the same mayor who was worth $5 billion in 2002 when he was first elected mayor and promised to work full time in office. Now he’s worth $23 billion. How many cops on scooters made $18 billion while working full-time for the city?
The role the police play in a modern society ought to be straightforward and well-known. The police broadly considered ought to act with certain goals in mind, namely — to implement the laws of the land while ensuring these laws are observed and bringing to the courts those individuals and institutions which fail to obey those laws. (At one time, the police were also charged with maintaining the general welfare of the people.) The police are empowered by law to meet these goals. Since the United States is a constitutional republic, policing in America must be performed in such a way that the police habitually observe constitutional norms while fulfilling their duties. When the police are considered in this way, it is clear that they are agents of the Constitution and are meant to create a constitutionally ordered society.
Once again, the role of the police in a modern society should be both simple and clear to all.
A few weeks ago I was with a few companions from Occupy Wall Street in Union Square when an old friend — I’ll call her Eileen — passed through, her hand in a cast.
“What happened to you?” I asked.
“Oh, this?” she held it up. “I was in Liberty Park on the 17th [the Six Month Anniversary of the Occupation]. When the cops were pushing us out the park, one of them yanked at my breast.”
“Again?” someone said.
We had all been hearing stories like this. In fact, there had been continual reports of police officers groping women during the nightly evictions from Union Square itself over the previous two weeks.
“Yeah so I screamed at the guy, I said, ‘you grabbed my boob! what are you, some kind of fucking pervert?’ So they took me behind the lines and broke my wrists.”
Actually, she quickly clarified, only one wrist was literally broken. She proceeded to launch into a careful, well-nigh clinical blow-by-blow description of what had happened. An experienced activist, she knew to go limp when police seized her, and how to do nothing that could possibly be described as resisting arrest. Police dragged her, partly by the hair, behind their lines and threw her to the ground, periodically shouting “stop resisting!” as she shouted back “I’m not resisting!” At one point though, she said, she did tell them her glasses had fallen to the sidewalk next to her, and announced she was going to reach over to retrieve them. That apparently gave them all the excuse they needed. One seized her right arm and bent her wrist backwards in what she said appeared to be some kind of marshal-arts move, leaving it not broken, but seriously damaged. “I don’t know exactly what they did to my left wrist—at that point I was too busy screaming at the top of my lungs in pain. But they broke it. After that they put me in plastic cuffs, as tightly as they possibly could, and wouldn’t loosen them for at least an hour no matter how loud I screamed or how much the other prisoners begged them to help me. For a while everyone in the arrest van was chanting ‘take them off, take them off’ but they just ignored them…”
The author continues by noting the obvious:
Arbitrary violence is nothing new. The apparently systematic use of sexual assault against women protestors is new. I’m not aware of any reports of police intentionally grabbing women’s breasts before March 17, but on March 17 there were numerous reported cases, and in later nightly evictions from Union Square, the practice became so systematic that at least one woman told me her breasts were grabbed by five different police officers on a single night (in one case, while another one was blowing kisses.) The tactic appeared so abruptly, is so obviously a violation of any sort of police protocol or standard of legality, that it is hard to imagine it is anything but an intentional policy.
From the rape squads around the world (that made mass rape a weapon of war) to the dirty-handed goon squads of the NYPD (who have added sexual assault to the weapons locker of a terrorist state), the goals thus pursued are held constant across time, space and culture: Terrorize the weak, especially women, demoralize the opposition, and the rule of law be damned.
What do I make of this report? The crimes committed by the New York Police Department reported by David Graeber should be considered signs. What do these signs signify? They point to the fact that the United States continues its slide into a state of barbarism.
- Is NYPD using sexual assault to defend Wall Street paymasters? (theweek.co.uk)
- The Crackdown on Occupy: Nasty as They Want to Be (sott.net)
- The Crackdown on Occupy (counterpunch.org)
- Wait Till Chen Guangchen Goes on His First Occupy Demonstration in New York (counterpunch.org)
- NYPD Using Sexual Assault as Law Enforement Tool (firedoglake.com)
The New York City Police Department, currently embroiled in scandals which are so common (ticket fixing, gun running and contraband smuggling, rape, killing of the unarmed, surveillance of the innocent, identity-biased stop-and-frisk searches, etc.) that they now define its very existence, added to its current scandal list when its members “rioted” (see this and this) while removing Occupy Wall Street protesters from Zuccotti Park in Manhattan. The protesters reoccupied the Park while celebrating the sixth-month anniversary of its emergence.
Sadly, not much has changed for the better since 1996 when Amnesty International released its infamous report on the NYPD’s human rights violations. To be sure, the Department’s political and corporate paymasters would not have it any other way.
- Occupy Wall Street Retakes Zuccotti Park, Kicks Off 2012 Protests @PolicyMic | Chris Miles (tribuneofthepeople.com)
- Occupy Wall Street Marks Anniversary With Zuccotti Park Protests (mediaite.com)
- Dozens Of Arrests As Protestors Re-Occupy Zuccotti Park To Kick-Off Spring Offensive (newyork.cbslocal.com)
- OWS Marks Sixth Month Anniversary Of Movement With Demonstration In Zuccotti Park (newyork.cbslocal.com)
- Aljazeera – Arrests At New York “Occupy” Protest – 18 March 2012 (lucas2012infos.wordpress.com)
- Arrests at New York ‘Occupy’ protests (rightways.wordpress.com)
- Arrests for “Occupy” Anniversary (socyberty.com)
- Are we going to do this again? (bullshitfighter.wordpress.com)
- A Muslim Wedding at Occupy Wall Street (timesunion.com)
- #OWS returns to Zuccotti Park (occupyblogosphere.wordpress.com)