Getting what you vote for
12.2.2013 Leave a comment
Related articles
- Effort to Repeal Obamacare is Nearly Dead (politicalwire.com)
- Obamacare Proves the Virtues of Federalism (priceofliberty.tumblr.com)
Hope is given for the sake of the hopeless
12.2.2013 Leave a comment
9.9.2013 Leave a comment
Let us recall a Kathleen Sebelius (Health and Human Services Secretary) interview which dates to 2009:
Asked if the administration’s program will be drafted specifically to prevent it from evolving into a single-payer plan, Sebelius says: “I think that’s very much the case, and again, if you want anybody to convince people of that, talk to the single-payer proponents who are furious that the single-payer idea is not part of the discussion.”
Sebelius says such concerns are unfounded because a single-payer plan is not under consideration, and these “draconian” scenarios have muddled the conversation over the president’s proposal for a public option.
“The whole idea of the public option has been difficult, in part, because some of the opposition has described it as a potential for a, you know, draconian scenario that was never part of the discussion in the first place,” Sebelius says. “So, disabusing people of what is not going to happen is often difficult, because there’s no tangible way to do that.”
Let us also recall that Obamacare (The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) will be neither universal nor affordable for many. Nor will it impose adequate controls on the costs generated by health care providers and drug companies. It might have mildly disinflationary effects on these costs. But it will not reduce them to a degree that they would approach the costs of care typical of a more rational health care system. Finally, Obamacare will make Uncle Sam the bagman for the health insurance industry.
America could have adopted a single-payer system that was universal, controlled costs, eliminated oligopoly profits, etc. But Obama and his party did and does not want that.
I wonder if the Democratic Party awards style points for exceptionally smarmy legislation?
All Tied Up and Nowhere to Go by Stephen Zielinski is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Socialism: Converting Hysterical Misery into Ordinary Unhappiness for a Hundred Years
12.10.2013 Leave a comment
In yesterday’s New York Times, Robert Pear reports on a little known fact about Obamacare: the insurance packages available on the federal exchange have very high deductibles. Enticed by the low premiums, people find out that they’re screwed on the deductibles, and the co-pays, the out-of-network charges, and all the different words and ways the insurance companies have come up with to hide the fact that you’re paying through the nose.
For policies offered in the federal exchange, as in many states, the annual deductible often tops $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a couple.
Insurers devised the new policies on the assumption that consumers would pick a plan based mainly on price, as reflected in the premium. But insurance plans with lower premiums generally have higher deductibles.
In El Paso, Tex., for example, for a husband and wife both age 35, one of the cheapest plans on…
View original post 1,268 more words
Filed under Commentary, Essay Tagged with Barack Obama, Class Conflict, Class Politics, Corey Robin, Economic Predation, Neoliberalism, Obamacare, Party Duopoloy, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, United States