A note on the obliteration of the ‘responsible’ left in Europe and the United States
11.8.2011 Leave a comment
Serge Halimi rightly points out that:
The Occupy Wall Street protests in the US are also directed against the Street’s representatives in the Democratic Party and the White House. The protesters probably don’t know that Socialists in France still consider Barack Obama exemplary, since, unlike President Sarkozy, he had the foresight to take action against banks. Is there a misunderstanding? Those who are unwilling or unable to attack the pillars of the neoliberal order (financialisation, globalisation of movements of capital and goods) are tempted to personalise the disaster, to attribute the crisis in capitalism to poor planning or mismanagement by their political opponents. In France it’s Sarkozy, in Italy Berlusconi, in Germany Merkel, who are to blame. And elsewhere?
Elsewhere, and not only in the US, political leaders long considered as models by the moderate left also face angry crowds. In Greece, the president of the Socialist International, George Papandreou, is pursuing a policy of extreme austerity: privatisations, cuts in the civil service, and delivering economic and social sovereignty to a ultra-neoliberal “troika” (1). The conduct of the Spanish, Portuguese and Slovenian governments reminds us that the term “left” is now so debased that it is no longer associated with any specific political content.
The current French Socialist Party spokesman explains the impossible situation of European social democracy very clearly: in his new book Tourner la page, Benoît Hamon writes: “In the European Union, the European Socialist Party is historically associated, through the compromise linking it with Christian democracy, with the strategy of liberalising the internal market and the implications for social rights and public services. Socialist governments negotiated the austerity measures that the European Union and the International Monetary Fund wanted. In Spain, Portugal and Greece, opposition to the austerity measures is naturally directed against the IMF and the European Commission, but also against the socialist governments … Part of the European left no longer denies that it is necessary, like the European right, to sacrifice the welfare state in order to balance the budget and please the markets. … We have blocked the march of progress in several parts of the world. I cannot resign myself to this” (2).
Others think the debasement is irreversible because it is connected to the gentrification of European socialists and their lack of contact with the world of work.
The upshot: Leftist reformers in Europe and America’s legacy parties will never implement radical and desirable reforms unless large and active movements compel them to do so.
Related articles
- Greece Set to Name Papademos Leader (online.wsj.com)
- In Turmoil, Greece and Italy Deepen Euro Crisis (nytimes.com)
- Greek Referendum Wins Backing (online.wsj.com)
- François Hollande chosen by French socialists for presidential elections (guardian.co.uk)
- Greece’s Papandreou faces key confidence vote (msnbc.msn.com)
- Socialists Square Off: Who’s to Face Sarkozy? (online.wsj.com)
- François Hollande chosen by French socialists for presidential elections – The Guardian (news.google.com)
- Greeks Hit Blocks in Bid to Name Government (online.wsj.com)
- Greek power-sharing talks in second day (seattlepi.com)
The Dennis Kucinich Debacle
3.13.2012 Leave a comment
Abby Rapoport attempted to rebut Glenn Greenwald‘s recent critique of her Kucinich smear: The Dennis Kucinich Debacle.
She fails, however. It would help Rapoport’s cause if she and The American Prospect had a realistic position on the Democratic Party and most of its politicians. But they do not. The Democratic Party lacks a viable place for a Kucinich, a fact that damns the Party, not Kucinich. Kucinich’s political instincts are sound; the political instincts of most Democratic Party politicians are unsound. Thus Kucinich’s lack of legislative achievements, the gist of Rapoport’s latest critique, only points to the dubious politics which dominate his Party. How might a left liberal (read: social democratic) politician enact legislation when the majority of his political Party oppose his positions and legislation? Why would anyone expect Kucinich to generate legislative victories when those victories would undermine his Party and its current practices? She cannot is she is also rational, especially when that legislation is put to a vote in a majoritarian system composed of only two political parties.
Filed under Commentary Tagged with Abby Rapoport, American Prospect, Democratic Party, Dennis Kucinich, Glenn Greenwald, Left Liberalism, Marcy Kaptur, Ohio, Party Duopoly, Reactionary politics, Social Democracy